






Fear: Nuclear Arms
Nhan Dinh, Stephanie King, and Van Chu
The 1950s is painted through a rose-colored glass portrait to depict a decade of optimism and development of an alternate social, political, cultural, and economical lifestyle from the status quo. However, the 1950s was not a still painting of affluence and prosperity but a decade plagued with great political anxiety due to fear of nuclear arms threatened by foreign countries. Although today’s perspective on the pivotal decade of the 50s emphasizes on the positive and constructive lifestyles of the generation, the critical fears that placed a burden on society in the 50s was gruesome and more traumatic than fixated. The panoramic scrutiny of the 1950s was, in reality, a time of conflict and dramatic fears of nuclear arms created to destroy a revolutionary American life.
The entire Cold War grew out of the fear of other countries and their increasing
powers. Although the Cold War is notoriously known as the war between
communists and nuclear as well as American weapons, it grew from America’s fear
of the increasing influence of the German Nazis in Europe. In 1939, reports
reached the United States through the Italian physician Enrico Fermi and the
German mathematician Albert Einstein, that the Nazi scientists were developing
technology on how to produce atomic fission in uranium taking the first step
toward the most powerful weapon that has ever been developed: the atomic bomb.
When Roosevelt was presented with this news, he immediately began the
development of atomic technology in weapons. From 1941 on, the government
secretly paid almost $2 billion into the “Manhattan Project,” an enormous
scientific effort conducted at hidden laboratories in numerous of sites located
throughout the United States. On July 16, 1945, New Mexico scientists witnessed
the first atomic explosion in the history of the world. With USSR’s growing
presence in Europe, the US hoped to intimidate Stalin with their new technology
at Potsdam.
During the meeting that was called to decide what was going to be done with the
war, Roosevelt revealed to Stalin their possession of atomic bombs. Instead of
astonishment, Stalin had a look of solitude on his face for he already knew of
the covert information. Through spies and the fear of America, Stalin had
already begun the production of his own atomic arms. From his point on, both
the USSR and the United States began an “arms race” to try to develop more
superior and powerful weapons than their counterparts. Through this fear of one
another, society, as well as the world, grew this sudden panic of fear as
technology continued to increase in efficiency.
From 1945 to the present, the nuclear bomb has been seen in four types or
classes. In 1945 the Trinity bomb was the first nuclear bomb to be detonated
and was seen as a tremendous and fearful weapon. However, there were two types
of bombs present in the United States: the uranium gun used in “Little Boy” and
the bomb used at Nagasaki. The uranium gun bomb used in “Little Boy” was
dropped on Hiroshima, which had a yield of 15 kilotons (15,000 tons) of
dynamite. The latter nuclear arm was the reliable implosion bomb used at
Nagasaki in “Fat Man” had a yield of about 22 kilotons. Both of these bombs
were tested frequently after World War II to further improve and develop
successful weapons used to attack the enemy. A result of these numerous testing
was the detonation of a fusion bomb in 1951 on Enwetak Atoll; however, the
Enwetak Atoll was not a real bomb but experimented with a yield of about 225
kilotons. In only 7 years, the United States had developed a new type of
nuclear bomb greater than 10 times that of the first three. However, the
country was still continuing and
Increasing the yield similar to that of the USSR who detonated a bomb of about 22 kilotons. The next evolution in the nuclear bomb was the hydrogen bomb, also known as the H-bomb for short. The H-bomb was first detonated in 1952 on Enewetak Atoll and had a yield of 10.4 megatons (100,400,000 tons) of dynamite; nonetheless, the H-bomb was the greatest of its time and was enormously destructive. By 1953, there have been nearly twenty six different operations to test nuclear bombs and detonating 316 separate nuclear weapons in four categories: atmospheric, surface, sea, and underground conditions. However, such tests proved to have a profound effect on the ecosystem and on the physical health of the American people.
As the testing proceeded into the 1950s and 1960s, the scientists discovered the
side effects of nuclear weapons and the fear it impacted on the American
society. After the explosions of nuclear weapons, it was unknown of what was to
become of the waste products. Unfortunately, the waste would be delivered by
air and wind to the people of a 5-50 miles radius of the explosion.
Nonetheless, this fallout would result in birth defects and harmful health
conditions. After further examinations, scientists concurred that the blast
areas of the nuclear bombs was not as dangerous as the fallout areas.
Furthermore, another fear that plagued the Americans was the number and range of
these powerful nuclear arms. After the introduction of the ICBM
(Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) as a nuclear delivery device, the threat
was closer than ever to homes in America. Because the fear of an attack was
ever so present to those that resided in the United States, many people
concocted bomb shelters and bunkers under
Their homes not knowing that the heat of a bomb would bake them in such shelters. The fear of nuclear arms created such a frenzy that the majority of people paid to obtain any knowledge of survival of a nuclear attack; however, regardless of any further survival information, the fallout would harm the safety of the people. Fear of nuclear arms was a predominant feature in the 1950s with the decade filled with nuclear bomb tests and assumption that America will sooner or later be attacked by nuclear weapons. From a small experiment at Trinity to a bomb that could eliminate a city in a flash was the central fear that plagued American lifestyles in the 1950s.
The 1950s was an age of contradictions from the optimistic perspective of liberated developments to fears of communism and nuclear arms threats from foreign countries. Although nostalgia leads modern mentality to relate the 50s as a decade full of “happy days,” the 50s was a time period plagued with trepidation of nuclear arms that had the ability to destroy the optimism surrounding the 50s culture. In reality, the decade so well known as the “happy days” was a decade of apprehension toward foreign powers and their ability to create nuclear arms that have the capacity to demolish all that that represented the notorious generation of the 1950s.
Works Cited
Brinkley, Alan American History: A Survey Chapter 28 McGraw-Hill College 1999
“Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Test” Membrane Domain http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/ June 15, 2004
“Nuclear Weapons: Nuclear Calendar” http://www.zvis.com/nuclear/nukcal.shtml
June 15, 2004
“What are Different types of Nuclear weapons?” AusSurvivalist http://www.aussurvivalist.com/nuclear/weapontypes.htm June 15, 2004

Fear: Communism
Ngoc Pham, Thao Nguyen, Vy Le, and Susan Mai
The 1950s was a time of fear. The greatest and most prevalent source of fear came from the threat or perceived threat of communism. This fear infiltrated every facet of American life—from international politics to domestic policies to the press and media. The driving force of this fear and its effects and ramifications help define the society--the history of the 1950s.
Fear of communism in the 1950s was impacted by America’s involvement in foreign affairs. The United States first major participation in the Cold War began on June 24, 1950 when “the armies of communist North Korea swept across their southern border in an invasion of the pro- Western half of the Korean peninsula to the south” (Brinkley 979). With the assistance of a soviet-equipped army, the North Koreans went passed the 38th parallel, which separated them from the South, and invaded South Korea. Although the Americans were able to send the North Korean communists back across the 38th parallel, the fear of communism was still evident in America. Many Americans still dreaded the invasion of communism and the Soviet Union in the United States. The fear of the Soviet Union and communism intensified when the “Soviet Union announced in 1957 that it had launched a satellite- Sputnik- which was orbiting the earth in outer space” (1005). Americans were distressed about the launch of Sputnik because the Soviet Union was able to establish a successful space program while the American’s efforts were ineffective. Americans believed that the Soviet Union’s ability to advance in technology posed as a threat because if Americans were unable to stop Sputnik then they were unable to prevent any bombs that the Soviets sent over. In effect to the fear of communism amongst Americans in the 1950s, Eisenhower’s secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, established a policy of “massive retaliation.” Dulles explained “the United States would respond to communist threats to its allies not by using conventional forces in local conflicts but by relying on the deterrent of massive retaliatory power (1021).” Dulles believed that Eisenhower’s containment policies had been unpromising and that the threat of massive retaliation would weaken communism. Although the policy was formed to stop communism, the real reason behind its efforts was the economy. The 1950s proved to be a decade of fear as foreign affairs, such as the Korean War and the launching of Sputnik, influenced the panic in America.
A few years prior to the 1950s, President Truman had launched a program to examine and ensure the loyalty of government employees, known as the Federal Loyalty Program. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under J. Edgar Hoover, who investigated and hassled thousands of alleged communists and radicals, enforced the program. By 1951, thousands had resigned and hundreds were dismissed (Brinkley 982). The investigations were a clear indication of the uneasiness and even panic of Americans to the prospect of communists at home.
The trial of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg more definitely confirmed the atmosphere of fear and alarm. In 1951, a New York couple, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were accused of passing on classified atomic information to the Soviets. After a long trial and several appeals, both were charged with espionage and died on the electric chair on June 19, 1953, leaving behind two orphaned children (Bailey 880). These events paved the way for the arrival of a man who would play on these American fears of communist infiltration and American disloyalty.
The 1950’s was a time of fear, especially the fear of communism and this fear led to the rise of one of the most unbecoming senator in the history of America. The fear of communism led to a “four year spree of accusations, charges, and threats” hat was known as McCarthyism after it’s advocator, Senator Joseph McCarthy (Halberstam 52). McCarthy, to better his own political career claimed that he has the list with the names of the people who were affiliated with communists. This caused a nation wide fear and triggered the search of anyone who acted like a communist. However, those hearings done by the House of Un-American Activities Committee to search of subversives in the government caused many great political leaders their job. Even though many people loathe McCarthy, they did not speak out against him for fear of being accused themselves. McCarthyism is very similar to the witch-hunt of the Puritan era. The decline of McCarthyism came when McCarthy accused Secretary of Army Robert Stevens. The nation finally saw McCarthy for what he really was, an insecure power-hungry alcoholic. His insecurities as a senator changed the lives of many people and three years after the end of McCarthyism, Joseph McCarthy died a victim of his alcohol.
With the madness of communism, movies develop to depict the irrational fear that
communism will take over
America. In 1956, a low budget film called Invasion of the Body Snatchers tells
a doctor‘s journey of encountering giant seedpods. Inside the seedpods, a human
figure grows to replicate an existing human being, and then the so called Aliens
takes the place of that human being but expresses no emotions, while the real
human becomes nonexistent. The giant seed pods represent the paranoia that
Americans have about communism that allowed McCarthyism to accuse and blacklist
hundreds of innocent victims. Toward the end, the main character, Dr. Miles
Benney, thought his fiancée was real until he kissed and found out the body
snatchers replaced her. Toward the end, he exclaims: "Look, you fools. You're
in danger. Can't you see? They're after you. They're after
all of us, our wives, our children, everyone. They're here already. You’re
next!” (Dirk 1) Miles further elaborates the fear by giving the illusion
that any person can be a communism, but since they look like regular Americans,
it
is hard
to distinguish who is really a communists. Another science fiction movie that
similarly develops the theme of communism is “The Blob,” which depicts a blob
from outer space swallowing anything in its path in a American town. With the
fear of communism, movies illustrates the mass hysteria in America.
The fear of communism created a mass hysteria among the American nation and these threats touched something deep in America’s politics and people. The fear of the spread of communism and living under the wrath of conformity without freedom sent American’s on a witch-hunt known as McCarthyism in search of communists. This fear bonded American’s together in a fight against communism but separated the nation because it brought distrust among neighbors and false accusations in order to gain power or land. The 1950’s was an era of fear.
Works Cited
Bailey, Thomas A. The American Pageant 12th Ed. Houghton Mifflin: Boston. 2002
Brinkley, Alan. American History: A Survey, Tenth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999.
Dirks, Tim.
“Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956). Rev. of “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”
by Walter Wanger. The Greatest Films 1996-2004. 12 June 1998
<http://www.filmsite.org/inva.html>.
Halberstam, David. The Fifties. Villard Books: New York. 1993
Consumption: Homes and Television
Jack Phan, Julie Lam, Peter Tran, Karla
Americans after WW 2 entered an era of prosperity and affluent. This general well-being can be most clearly seen in the mass consumption of consumer’s goods fueled by television and the housing boom. The followings are facts and analysis that we have gathered from various sources detailing the important aspects of this drive for consumption.
Television
During the 1950s television was booming. For example, children and teenager spend more hours watching TV then they spend in schools and other institutions (Bradley). This then impacted young Americans profoundly since TV came to define what is the social norms. The youth culture came to be determined by TV ever growing
presence in American society. TV grow so much that by 1955 “two-thirds of the nation’s homes have a set; by the end of the 1950s there was hardly a home without one”. In fact, more homes have televisions then indoor plumbing (Solomon). This only serve to proved the growing power of television. Television’s growing powers then was use in advertising and influenced people to consume products that they would have never dream of before. Raucer Reeves was the most successful with using television to push the sales of goods. His simple, repetitive, but surprisingly effective commercials boosted sales every time they were shown. However, despite all the positive aspects television seems to have, it have major disadvantages that still plague modern society. For example, television have caused many people to spend hours watching it instead of doing other more beneficial activities. Another negative impact made by this device is gives
false images such as the super-moms that all suburban housewives strives to be and greatly distort the dangers of the modern world (Halberstam). TV then one could argue only serves to distort and exaggerate our view of reality. Television then had influenced our society to a point that one can hardly imagine life without it.
The Levitt Towns
When the men from WW2 came back home most were seeking the American dream. A part of that dream is to own a home in the suburbs and create a family. With the passing of the GI bills it only became easier for the fruition of that dream. However, there was the problem of the shortages of housing created by the decline of housing construction since the 1920s. One man step up to the challenge of supplying the demands for homes and his name was William Levitt. He constructed in mass houses using assembling techniques he learned from his days in the armed forces. The result was a range of cookie-cutter homes that would be sold off cheaply to young couples. To promote his new housing development he tried to sell off the
Levittown's as a great big community that one could utilized to raise a family. The allure of supposed freedom and privacy that could be bought at a low price lured droves of people to the new establishments. Unfortunately, the dream was hallowed and false as the strict regulations and homogeneity proved that the freedom promised by Levitt was a mere illusion. Another set of conformist ideal was then pushed unto the American people. Furthermore, the suppose communal promise was totally imaginary as America became more segregated than ever. The great White Flight into the suburbs turned the American
landscape into another extension of the Southern Way. Quite contradicting isn’t it? Fortunately, the hosing boom was not all bad as it did boost the economy in profound ways. As people moved into the towns in masses more goods and products were demanded to furnish the new homes. The goods one have before moving into a home never was enough and as people proceeded in their spending frenzy American society as a whole prospered. Consumption then was made the more possible by the housing industry. The economic domino effect one could say (Hales).
In all, the consumption in the 1950s were pushed primary by the thriving housing and television industry. Who could imagine our society without television and the homogeneous neighborhoods of modern society? All thanks to the 1950s.
Works Cited
Bradley, Becky. “Television”. Kingwood College Library. July 22nd, 2003.
http://kclibrary.nhmccd.edu/decade50.html#tv
Halberstam, David. The Fifties. Villard Books, New York. 1993.
Hales, Peter. Levittown: Documents of an ideal American Suburbs. University of Illinois at Chicago. June 14th, 2004.
http://tigger.cc.uic.edu/~pbhales/Levittown.html
Solomon, Jerry. Television. Probe Ministry. June 14th, 2004.
http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/tv.html
Consumption: Autos
Katherine Lam, Steven Troung, and Youstina Aziz
The prosperity of the 1950’s sparked the increase of consumption in America. People started renovating everything from homes to toasters; and thus, it led to the increase of consumption in all areas, especially with cars.
This consumption world all started with the development of Levittown, a uniform community in the suburbs that provided affordable homes. People needed cars in order to have independent transportation (Hawley). Levittown consisted over “seven thousand homes that were being sold for les than eight thousand dollars each” (Hawley). Therefore, Levittown quickly became popular as it pulled people away from the cities and into the suburbs. Moreover, the second greatest cause for this high “consumption rate of cars is due to the television” (Hawley). During the 1950’s, “ten million sets were sold in America” (Hawley). Times were changing and the television reflected it, hence, portraying America as a society that needed cars, not wanted them. Fathers needed cars to go to work and to take the family out on Sundays. Women needed the cars to take their kids to extracurricular activities and to go to the market. These were all valid reasons that made the car a necessity.
Causes
of the cars’ consumption that mostly relate to the postwar chaos of Levittown
led to an interest in various designs and structure of typical 1950s’ automobile
where many citizens wanted. The famous American company, General Motors, of the
1950s spurred the craziness of car consumption with numerous brands, such as
Buick, Cadillac, and Chevrolet (“General Motors” 1). General Motors’ cars of
the 1950s took shape of a contemporary style taken by structures of American war
planes during World War II that depict an outlook for
the future (“Style Wars” 1). The General Motors Company created a modern style
for cars that seem to appeal an image of the future as if drivers were driving
“into the future” that led to unnecessary additional parts on a 1950s car for a
modern look giving more engine power but also more connection to consumption as
more money is necessary to pay for the car. Furthermore, American consumers
especially loved the craftwork of the 1959 Cadillac model that became popular in
which was created after the creation of other earlier famous 1950s cars, such as
the 1950 Chevrolet, the 1953 Chevrolet Corvette, and the 1950 Cadillac (“The
Fifties”). The consumption craze of modern-looking automobiles during the 50s
caused a change in living standard where “incomes have stagnated and the robust
3 percent growth rates of the 1950s are long gone” (Schor 1). Because of the
numerous advertisements, especially GM’s introduction of various brands of cars,
American consumers showed an interest in what they wanted than what they
actually needed that only caused problems of perhaps too much consumption.
Although 1950s cars had many fantastic designs that grasp any American
consumer’s attention, the effects of the 1950s car consumption were only effects
that demonstrated two opposite perspectives of a society run by automobiles.
Just as different changes in society caused the emergence of cars, the automobiles produced many other outcomes affecting politics, economy, and also structure of the United States. Charles Wilson, the director of General Motors in 1953, explained the effect of cars on the country’s politics when he stated that “what is good for America is good for GM” and vise versa (Hawley). In the 1950s, the United Auto Workers was the strongest union in the country (Hawley). The political effect of the automobiles showed through the strength it had on both the American workers and leaders. In 1953, GM had 45% of the market (Halbertan 129). Consequently in 1956, it had 51% of the market of cars (129). The increasing authority of the single car company in the market offered a clear view of the economic dominance and influence of the automobile industry. In 1956, the Eisenhower administration enacted the Interstate Highway Act which offered 40,000 miles of roads built throughout the United States (Hawley). In addition, McDonald’s became the first chain drive-in restaurant in the country (Hawley). The passage of the Highway Act demonstrated the effect of cars on the structure of the country while the structure of the drive-through showed the country’s new style and way of life that depended on cars. The act showed a clear influence of the cars on the structure and design of the roads of transportation and their extent. Because of the emergence of cars as a major method of transportation, the different cars offered a change in the relations and styles of the American life.
Works Cited
“The Fifties.” A and E Entertainment. 24 February 1998. 17 May 2004.
“General Motors.” Ruv.net. 2004. 1. Infovoyager. 13 June 2004 <http://infopedia.ruv.net/ge/General_Motors.html>.
Halberstan, David. The Fifties. 1st ed. New York: Villard Books, 1993
Hawley, William. "Car Influence." Advanced Placement for United States History. L building, Fountain Valley. 20 May 2004.
Schor, Juliet. “The New Politics of Consumption.” Boston Review. 1993-2004. 1. 13 June 2004 <http://www.bostonreview.net/BR24.3/schor.html>.
“Style Wars of the 1950s.” American Car Culture. 1. Colby College. 13 June 2004 <http://www.colby.edu/personal/z/zssager/style.html>.
Struggle with Conformity
Kim Nguyen, Chris Nguyen, and David Pham
America in the 1950s appears to be a society characterized with the doom of its own post war triumph and economic prosperity. Coinciding with these deceptively auspicious traits is the undeniable demise of individualism. What makes this an even more ironic time period is the startling, but palpable emptiness of the soul and spiritual restlessness that seem to simultaneously exist with the prosperity of this most paradoxical era. For many war weary veterans and their domesticated wives, unconscious conformity was an effect of this unprecedented social affluence. However, a gradual sense of rebellion and disillusionment also began to reach eager ears, provoking these conformists to protest against falling victim to the same droning lifestyle and its exalted expectations. The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit written by Sloan Wilson and The Feminine Mystique written by Betty Friedan are the two most definitive and celebrated literary works produced during this era. The novels truly capture the sense of spiritual and personal loss for the individual in the somber roles set up by their rigid society.
Another literary
piece of work that exemplifies the theme of conformity in the 1950s is Sloan
Wilson's The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit. The main character of the novel is a
representative of all the men in the 1950s
who became conformists by putting on a suit every day and going to work in large
corporations. Their life became devoted this mundane routine known as the rat
race (Halberstam). The lives of the men of the 1950s were limited in their
ability and potential because they were victims of suburbanization. The trend
of the era was for a man to be married and to maintain job in order to support
his family and its consumption. This did not allow a man to have any sense of
freedom or enjoyment, even though throughout the era the people had been more
prosperous than ever before. The men of the 50s who wore their gray flannel
suits and went to work everyday lived "through their ordinary lives with gritted
teeth and sometimes fixed smiles" (Meador). The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit
was a representation of the discontent of the men of the time. A great number
of men were discontent because they were forced to enter their dull jobs right
after leaving the world of war. They were not used to unexciting world of work,
and wanted to experience the thrill they had during World War II.
The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan changed and greatly altered the role of
the woman. The
traditional value of a woman was stretched to a point never seen by people of
the period before. The socialistic character of a female person was altered in
the book to show a challenge to the conformity world around them. While the
Flannel Suit explained the working man, the Feminine Mystique showed the
rebellion of the woman. Both booked exemplified the change of the era and the
beginning of a different value system. The role of the American man and woman
was changed forever as a result.
The 50s was a time of change and development, but also a period of rebellion. Traditional values were constantly questioned and individualism became a growing idea. Writers like Sloan and Friedan placed the values of the struggle against conformity into their stories, which told the basic views of the fifties. With booming economy, America assumed world power, but with great powers created much turmoil and change within itself. The 50s became the playground of change that created new values for modern day America that changed the role of the entire nation long after the era was over.
Works Cited
Bishop, Jill. "The Feminine Mystique."
http://www.bishopfamily.info/Essays/feminine_mystique.htm . 11 Jun 2004 <>.
Halberstam, David. The Fifties. Villard Books: New York, 1994.
Meador, Sarah. "Sloan Wilson, The Man In The Gray Flannel Suit." Rambles 22 Feb
2003. 11 June 2003. <http://www.rambles.net/wilson_grayflannel.html>

Civil Rights Struggle
Leslie Ramirez, Annie Hoang, and Janice Le
“Give me Liberty or give me death,” Thomas Jefferson stated in his speech, which would prove to be a slogan for the rest of the Americans. African Americans, who were fed up with not having equal liberties as their white counterpart, begin their national civil rights movement in the 1950s.
The Civil Rights Movement stemmed from the 1950s as challenges came to the court on public segregation. Supreme Justice Earl Warren had to deal with the laws that were set forth with Jim Crow. Segregated public schooling would envelope all-white schools and inferior black schools, as set forth in the court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson. Angered blacks around the country would soon begin their campaign against such injustice. Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP begin to challenge the courts at the elementary school level with minor cases and moved their way up to the high court. Supreme Justice Earl Warren made the tough decision of giving the verdict to Marshall in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, which started to desegregate some schools. Opposition was met in the southern states as all-white schools would have to assimilate black students in. Arising from the Brown decision, leaders and activists would begin to fight for their rights.
Nearly fifteen million blacks were living in the 1950s and two thirds of them
were living in the south. They spend their lives in a peculiar arrangement of
separate social arrays that kept them isolated from whites economically and
politically. The NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People, tried persistently to dismantle the harsh rules of segregation and in
the end received success. In 1950, the NAACP consists of leaders known as
Thurgood Marshall, William Hastie, and James Nabrit who were all educated as
lawyers by Charles Houston at Howard University in Washington. These lawyers
dealt with the Brown decision and many others against school boards that dealt
with integrating schools in such cases as Topeka and Kansas that became the
basis of the Brown decision. These men accumulated examples to support their
assault on their “separate buy equal” doctrine. Another organization that formed
in the 1950s was the Southern Christian Leadership Conference by a well known
leader, Martin Luther King Jr. His amazing oratorical skills, his devotion to
biblical and constitutional concepts were the basis of this organization. The
nonviolent principles of Mohandas Gandhi, the discipline from Civil Disobedience
of Henry David Thoreau and as well as the Christian doctrine were all the
forefront of the black revolution that would soon spread throughout the nation.
King approached to solve the racial struggle and urged African Americans to only
engage in peaceful demonstrations, whereas, to be prepared to get arrested, to
receive beatings, and to respond to hate with love.
Other African Americans who contributed to the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s, is Rosa Parks. She is an active civil rights leader in the community and when was told to be seated in the back of the bus, she refused. This then ignited other black leaders in Montgomery to use this to challenge the segregation of buses. Her arrest led many African Americans in the community to help other local leaders to organize an effective boycott of the bus system to end segregation in public transportation. Later in the mid 1950s African Americans establishes themselves as important athletes in professional sports. One athlete is Jack Roosevelt “Jackie” Robinson, a baseball player for the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947. Robinson was able to crack part of the racial barrier in sports. With that in mind, President Eisenhower completes the integration of the armed forces and to desegregate the federal work force. Thus leading to the 1957 civil rights act providing a federal; protection for blacks who wanted to vote.
Through the efforts of many organizations and leaders a series of events in the
50’s began to pave the way for the rising
civil rights movement. It would take
the bravery of Rosa Parks on December 1, 1955 in Montgomery, Alabama refusing to
give up her seat to a white person on the bus to ignite a series of events. With
the aid of local leaders a boycott of public transportation began and finally
ended when the Supreme Court ruled segregation on public transportation illegal
in 1956. An organized approach to the Civil Rights struggle rising in the 50’s
gave the movement a power which it had not formally known. Later in September of
1957 President Eisenhower would have to enforce federal when a black girl would
not be admitted to enter school, this was known as the Little Rock incident.
Eisenhower would also aid the movement that year bye signing a civil rights that
completely integrated the armed forces. With the aid many people changes began
to occur it would take deceive action for the movement for major action to begin
occurring. The movement in the 1950’s would continue and progress greatly in the
1960’s with events, such as the sit-in- act F.W. Woolworth that occurred on
February 1, 1960.
Works Cited
Bailey, Thomas, Kennedy, David. The American Pageant. Lexington: D.C. Health Company. 1991.
Brinkley, Alan, American History: A Survey. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 1999. 1015 – 1018.
Nonconformity: Film and Music
During the years following WWII, extreme societal pressures emerged from the
media and from the people themselves to conform. However, those dissatisfied
with the materialistic, affluent society searched for an escape from the
confinements of the American dream. As a result, a counterculture led by the
‘beatniks’ emerged, as seen through the underlying messages of film and music.
Films such as The Wild One and Rebel
Without a Cause as well as
music artists such as Elvis Presley all came to embody the non-conformist spirit
of the 1950s.
In a film directed by Laszlo Benedek, The Wild One tells the tale of a group of young, insurgent motorcyclists who stumble upon a town named Wrightsville, and wreak havoc after being kicked out of other various places that did not welcome them. Johnny Strabler, the main character played by Marlon Brando, portrays the ringleader of the group who constitute The Black Rebel Motorcycle Club. Proceeding into this town, Johnny meets a young girl named Kathie Bleeker whose father is the local sheriff. “At first it appears that the two couldn’t be anymore different, he’s a rebellious free spirit and she’s lead quite a sheltered life going by rules and discipline. But it is through Kathie that we get to know the real Johnny as it is revealed that behind all the macho bravado he is quite a lost insecure soul unable to emotionally communicate with anyone, which explains why he behaves as he does” ( “Wild” 1). Meanwhile, Johnny’s old friend, Chino, finds Johnny in Wrightsville and ends up going to jail after picking a fight with an authoritative figure in town named Charlie Thomas. The Black Rebels throw Charlie into jail as well and disrupt the town’s peace by giving it a taste of their vivacity. The townspeople are caught in a parallel between their world that is predictable and organized and between a world that is chaotic and capricious, symbolizing the significant correlation between the traditional and counter cultures. Ultimately, Johnny and his club are forced to leave town and to never return, ending his unspoken romance with Kathie Bleeker and discovering the little part of himself that realizes the goodness in people who are not all out to get him.
Although The Wild One “might look quite tame compared to today’s standards at the time of its release,” it was “considered ground breaking stuff which upset its fair share of people. However, it helped inspire the era of rebellion which led to such classics as the James Dean epic Rebel Without a Cause” (“Wild” 1). Johnny’s characterization of an arrogant and obnoxious youth correlates with the counterculture at the time of the fifties that strived for a sense of individuality and freedom away from the authoritative constraints of having a house, car, and kids.
The 1955 film Rebel Without A Cause
epitomizes the rebelliousness evident in the fifties youth. The screenplay by
Stewart Stern was based on "an actual case study (in Dr. Robert Lindner's 1944
factual book titled Rebel Without A Cause) of a delinquent, imprisoned
teenage psychopath in the post-war years” (Dirks 1). This classic film,
originally titled The Blind Run, focuses on the character of Jim Stark
(played by James Dean), a rebellious social outcast who searches for his meaning
and identity through his familial neglect and his two fellow teenage misfits
(Judy and Plato). At “the age when nothing fits” as Judy’s mother puts it,
these three teenagers, misfits themselves, must learn to deal with their
dysfunctional lives—Jim whose parents refuse to face their own problems as well
as his, Judy whose father is abusive and cannot cope with her womanhood, and
Plato whose homosexuality leads his parents to abandon him to a maid. These
teenagers are incapable of understanding their parents’ actions as their parents
are of their actions, which creates a rift not only within these families but
within the community as well. Plato, because of this lack of understanding, is
killed, which goes to show that adults do not provide teenagers with solutions
but rather provide them with mere suggestions. Throughout the film, the
parent-child relationship is tense, but even at the end “there is no
reconciliation between the teenagers and their parents, or between their parents
and each other” (McKeen 2). Between Plato’s death and the misunderstanding,
there is no solution to the plight of these teenagers. This pessimistic
description of adolescent years in a cause and effect relationship refuses “to
brush off teen years as inconsequential and offers no easy solutions” (3).
Rather than attempting to rationalize the counterculture of the 1950s, Rebel
Without A Cause frankly reflects the plight of adolescence of teenagers like
Jim Stark and draws a picture of the rebellious, misunderstood youth
(counterculture) in the face of the static boring mainstream culture,
juxtaposing counterculture rebelliousness seen in the character of Jim Stark
with the conformist 1950s.
In music artists like Elvis Presley, much of the same rebellious style was incorporated into his musical masterpieces as well. During the fifties, the emerging Rock and Roll music of Elvis Presley epitomized the nonconformist spirit of the growing counter culture. Blues and country music from earlier decades combined to form a new sound. Elvis took this new sound to millions of homes across the nation, bringing him fame as well as devotion from fans in the fifties looking for new nonconformist music different from their parents.
Although Elvis grew up in a small town, the discovery of Elvis Presley as a musical artist influenced and shocked the music world. As a nervous teen of eighteen years, Elvis walked into Sun recording studio to record what he claimed was a birthday gift for his mother. Sam Philips, impressed by the Elvis' ballad singing and his influence of what was then called race music, signed Elvis to his recording label, Sun Records (Presley, Elvis 1). Elvis embodied the perfect candidate to be the first big Rock and Roll star because he was a white man that could perform black music as well as the black artists due to his poor Southern upbringing. During the fifties, conformity pressures would not allow and accept black artists as readily as a white one. Thus, Sam Philips believed Elvis would launch this new sound because he contained the good-looking southern boy look, which was acceptable to the adults (Halberstam). As a result, Elvis' music acted as a spring board for other artists in Rock and Roll to rebel against conformist music since his looks allowed his music to be spread among the young teens of the counter culture.
Adults and the conformist culture were frightened and angered by the nonconformist music Elvis popularized. The term rock and roll originally refers to having sex (Halberstam). As a result, white parents were afraid of the association of Rock and Roll music with sex, Satan, and sin. In addition, many adults associated Rock and Roll music solely with African American music, and their racist views did not approve of this influence. Elvis' sang romantic ballads as well as faster Rock and Rolls songs. His controversial erotic style of gyrations on stage gained Elvis popularity among teens. However the same style of dance alienated adults and authority figures of the day (Presley, Elvis 1). Thus Elvis' music acts as another symbol for the non-conformist spirit among young people to rebel against their parents and their parent's conformist way of life.
Although the fifties were typically known for conformity and societal pressures to imitate the American Dream, nonconformist music and film provided an outlet for those uncomfortable with the conservative society. These emerging nonconformists developed a counterculture to illustrate their alienated feelings and rebellious urges. Characters from The Wild One and Rebel Without A Cause roamed about towns looking for trouble and freedom against societal confinements while millions of fanatic fans listened into the new African American influenced sounds of Rock and Roll led by Elvis Presley. Rebellious films and music of the fifties spoke the voice of the beatniks to a generation to cultivate the youth counterculture.
Works Cited
Dirks, Tim. “Rebel Without A Cause (1955).” Film site. 2004.
<http://www.filmsite.org/rebel.html>.
Halberstam, David. The Fifties. New York: Ballantine Books, Inc., 1994.
McKeen, Nate. “Rebel Without A Cause As Autobiographical Validation.”
<http://www.imagesjournal.com\issue05\features\jamesdean.htm>.
"Presley, Elvis." Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia. 2004.
<http://encarta.msn.com>. © 1997-2004 Microsoft Corporation.
"The Wild One, 1953." IMDB. 2004: 1. <http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0047677/>.

Nonconformity: The Beats
Elric Chou, Bill Giang, and Quan Voung
In the 1950s there was a lot of fear among many Americans about living in the Cold War period, and the possibility that the human world would end. However, a group of young people began to question how society had defined roles in America, a group began to grow in size to counter the current culture of the 50s, there people would begin a new idealism known as Beat. The Beat generation, spreading from New York City to San Francisco, focused on the idea of non conformity and the desire to be different from the accepted normalcy of the 1950s people. This generation wished to avoid being victims of things related to conformity such as “rat races”, flannel suits, routine, etc. In some cases, the conformity made some feel as if a part of them was taken away like men losing their manhood to the corporate world.
The culture of the 1950s was basically conservative and right-wing while the counter-culture was liberal and left-wing. With the culture, there was a sense for more economic freedoms. The counter-culture, on the other hand, supported the personal freedoms of the individual. This gap was more than political as age was a major factor. The youth tend to be part of the counter-culture while those that were older were part of the culture.

The beat generation would be influenced by a man who wanted to change the way
people saw society. The name Beat was given to the people involved in the new
movements because they felt beat down or held down by society. The name Beatnik,
however, would come from those of the current culture. It was basically the
culture’s attempt to shame the Beats by relating them to the Communists. In
this case, the Soviet satellite Sputnik was integrated with the name Beat. Jack
Kerouac wrote a book about his journey with his new friend Neal Casidy on the
road traveling west. His influence through his book On the Road was a
collection of events on his trip that he wrote whatever he felt like writing in
his own personal way. Jack writes when
,
"Route 6 came over the river, wound around a traffic circle, and disappeared
into the wilderness. Not only was there no traffic but the rain come down in
buckets and I had no shelter. I had to run under some pines to take cover; this
did no good; I began crying and swearing and socking myself on the head for
being such a damn fool," the idea of not following the normal ways and branching
out of the ordinary many non-conformist began to act freely. The beatniks used
the ideas of On the Road and Jack's ideas to form a counter culture that
contradicted the way the American people lived their lives. Kerouac is an
influential part of the idea that non-conformity movement in because the many
people felt displaced, and they had an outlet to express themselves from the
socially accepted way of life. All they wish to do was to just go against many
qualities of the culture. Because there was not one distinct thing for the
counter-culture to go against, the Beats were basically “rebels without a
cause”.
The beat generation had a large impact on the literature during the time. The
beats tried to change the
style of writing to reflect their views on society. The whole purpose of writing
for a beat was to find the highest level of spirituality that once can achieve
through the art of writing. Beat works admired friendship, sexuality, drug use,
and outcasts while using jazz as its motivation and style. In simpler terms,
anything that the culture did not approve or were not “square”, the Beats would
enjoy and approve of it. Among the many writers of the time noteworthy ones
included Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac. Allen Ginsberg was very successful and
in 1956 his epic poem, Howl, received much attention from society. Many
people congratulated him for his break through work while others criticized him
for his openness to homosexuality and narcotics. These mixed opinions
exemplified the way the 1950’s was. There was such a definite gap between the
culture and the counter culture as it soon came into view that they were pure
opposites of one another. With Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac both made a large
impact on poetry.
Important figures helped to shape the image of the Beat Generation and the ideas they were trying to express. The Beatniks showed the American people that non-conformity was a growing trend, acceptable, and it was okay to be abnormal. The Beatniks changed American society giving new ideals about living free and not yielding to the socially accepted way of life, but also gave a sense from the culture to keep society the way it was.
Works Cited
Brinkley, Alan. American History: A Survey, Tenth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999.
Literary Kicks. “From 'On The Road' by Jack Kerouac” http://www.litkicks.com/Texts/RoadRoute6.html
The Beat Page. RookNet Project. Copyright 1997-2001. http://www.rooknet.com/beatpage/writers/index.html
This webpage was designed and created by the class of 2005.